Difference between revisions of "Ecosystem Approach Community of Practice: VRE planning"

Revision as of 20:39, 12 October 2013

Virtual Research Environments (VREs) are web based working environments tailored to serve the needs of a specific eScience scenario.

The iMarine project is called to deploy and operate a number of VREs to satisfy the needs arising in selected scenarios identified by the Ecosystem Approach Community of PracticeA term coined to capture an "activity system" that includes individuals who are united in action and in the meaning that "action" has for them and for the larger collective. The communities of practice are "virtual", ''i.e.'', they are not formal structures, such as departments or project teams. Instead, these communities exist in the minds of their members, are glued together by the connections they have with each other, as well as by their specific shared problems or areas of interest. The generation of knowledge in communities of practice occurs when people participate in problem solving and share the knowledge necessary to solve the problems.. The plan governing this VREs operation activity is documented in a dedicated wiki page.

Such a plan mainly results from the needs and desiderata with respect to VREs that the Ecosystem Approach CoPCommunity of Practice. documented by this page.

VREs Specification Procedure

The specification of a VREVirtual Research Environment. mainly consists in a characterisation of the expected service in terms of data/datasets to be made available, facilities to be offered, and qualitative aspects to be guaranteed. In addition to that the service characterization should include the target scenario it is conceived for.

Such a characterisation is expected to be produced by the CoPCommunity of Practice., however it requires an assessment before being submitted to the project Consortium for the actual implementation of the service. This assessment consists of a review procedure having three phases:

1. iMarine Board Review: the members of this board are called to assess the technological and functional 'added value' that will be provided by any proposed VREVirtual Research Environment.. This review procedure applies to all types of VREVirtual Research Environment.'s, services and resources identified in the project that will be exposed to the CoPCommunity of Practice.;
2. PEB Review: the Project Executive Board is called to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed VREVirtual Research Environment. as well as to perform a cost-benefit analysis of the proposal;
3. Consortium Review: the project members involved in the implementation of the VREVirtual Research Environment. are called to evaluate the feasibility of the proposed VREVirtual Research Environment. implementation and to agree on a deployment schedule;

If all the three review phases are passed, the project agrees to implement the identified VREVirtual Research Environment. and start working on it.

Proposed VREs

Several VREVirtual Research Environment.'s are already used, while others are being implemented. Throughout the project, VREVirtual Research Environment.'s will be built, sometimes 'on top of' other VREVirtual Research Environment.'s. This VREVirtual Research Environment. planning page is a living page, where the several stages of VREVirtual Research Environment. development are tracked. These go from inception (1), proposal (2), review (3), implementation (4), to delivery (5).

After delivery, the functioning and use of the VREVirtual Research Environment. will be subject to validation, for which a dedicated wiki page is available.

The delivered VREVirtual Research Environment.'s have been validated, but will need various modifications (June 2013).

1. FCPPS (5) The reporting tool;
2. ICIS (4) The Timeseries management environment;
3. AquaMaps (5) The species predictive modeling environment;
4. VTI (4) The Vessel Transmitted Information management and modeling environment;

In additon, several VREVirtual Research Environment. similar gCubeApps have been released, most notably the

1. BiodiversityResearchEnvironment (5) The environment to access and browse species occurrence data from multiple Darwin Core enabled repositories, and to view these in the GeoExplorer tool;
2. EcologicalModeling (4) The combination of data, tools and services to deliver species predictive maps and datasets, conceived as a richer AquaMaps;

Already in an advanced state of implementation, either as independent VREVirtual Research Environment.'s, or as extensions to the above are:

1. SPREAD (4) Building on a subset of ICIS capabilities, SPREAD will add geospatial reallocation features ;
2. Codelistmanager (4) The management of Codelists requires the further development of the facility in ICIS;
3. CodelistMapper (3) The generation of persistent mappings between codes, code lists, and data using those codes requires that similar functionality developed in ICIS be made available as a separate VREVirtual Research Environment.. In addition, it will have to be enabled to extract data using Cotrix components; a code lists and vocabulary management environment being developed by FAO and others;
4. VME DB (3) The Vulnerable Marine Ecosystem database will contain VME Factsheets. These factsheets rely on services provided in FCPPS for document workflow and content management, and will be published using the FiMES schema. The use cases and requirements are not completed (August2013);
5. SpeciesModeller (3) The AquaMaps VREVirtual Research Environment. with added algorithms, enriched with additional algorithms supported by e.g. OpenModeler;
6. SpeciesChart (4) Interactive display and editing of OBIS and other occurrence data, related to TrendyLyzer;
7. FishFinderVRE (5) Reporting tool and work flow environment based on FCPPS to facilitate the collation and editing of Species Fact Sheets;
8. FishFinderOffLine (5) Reporting tool based on FishFinder for authors to compile Species Fact Sheets.
9. SpeciesNameFinder (4) Species name disambiguation tool. And nothing more than that.
10. TBTI (2) The Too Big To Ignore VREVirtual Research Environment. will serve the EA-CoPCommunity of Practice. interested in the socio-economic data specific to small scale fisheries, their geospatial context, and document retrieval.

In addition, a range of new VREVirtual Research Environment.'s that answer to specific data manipulation needs has been identified to support other VREVirtual Research Environment.'s; they provide functionality that other VREs may need to increase their uptake, or that open new data sources to existing VREVirtual Research Environment.'s Most of these are planned to be released in 2013, and can not be described as of June 2013.

1. TaxonReconciliation (3) Use iMarine and FAO technologies to calculate distances between objects, and draw relationships between lists of objects. A first candidate is the ICIS functionality for code list discovery and curation. Another application to integrate would be the FAO VRMF tool. The first domain where the tool would be tested are species names. It would also allow to improve information in existing datasets, e.g. with a geonames locator;
2. Semantic Annotator (3) The FAO services to annotate a document. Existing FAO services that might be re-purposed here are FLOD, the AgroTagger and VocBench;
3. KB Browser (2) This service will prepare request to FLOD, and manage the results by e.g. integrating these in the a FCPPS report. Also IRD will have to describe their expectations.
4. FishFrame (3) The support for the IRD / EU FishFrame format and COST model. These specifications can only be produced after the EA-COP settles on the format, exploitation model, and data sets;
5. NEAFC2ICES (2) Support to NEAFC to 1.) anonymize confidential data in their infrastructure, 2) publish these anonymized datasets in a controlled repository, 3) ensure that these data-sets can be analyzed in a variety of other VREVirtual Research Environment.'s for e.g. statistical trend analysis, plotting, graphing and tabulation.
6. MixeR (2) Support to read from / write to an integrated, parallelized, or external R instance. This component will build on the existing R functions in ICIS.
7. Trendylyzer (4) Analytical tool, with a similar concept to Trendalyzer / gapminder for data manager to discover long-term trends in TimeSeries.
8. EA-Linked Open Data (3) A toolset to produce Linked Open Data in the iMarine e-infrastructure.
9. SmartFish (3) A toolset to offer a advanced search and data retrieval over 3 data repositories (XML, Excel and a database) focused on capture species data through the iMarine e-infrastructure.

Additionally, the CoPCommunity of Practice. offers a host of independent services that will require to be interoperable with the VREVirtual Research Environment.'s. Examples are OpenSDMX, Cotrix, and Spread. these can be described in separate wiki's:

1. OpenSDMX. OpenSDMX is the FAO Open Source project in support to SDMX data acquisition and dissemination.
2. CotrixCotrix. Cotrix is the development of a shared code list manager. It is currently identical to the code list manager above. It can become a Open Source development tool, once FAO departments decide that it is worth investing in.
3. FLOD is the Semantic data-set combined strategic FAO Assets in a knowledge base. FAO uses iMarine resources to enrich this dataset, and position it as a knowledge base for other resources to refer to concepts rather than string literals. The FLOD content management is currently being bolstered through the development of a Semantic data work-flow.

Other tools extract data from the iMarine e-infrastructure, but do not rely on specific services or resources. The data may be prepared in a VREVirtual Research Environment., but the are consumed e.g. through a web service only.

1. iMarine Species App; (3) The updated version of the AppliFish mobile app;
2. AppliFish2; (2) A redesigned AppliFish with better integration with e-infra services, such as search and country-statistics.

VREVirtual Research Environment. Specification Template

The many opportunities provided by Virtual Research EnvironmentA ''system'' with the following distinguishing features: ''(i)'' it is a Web-based working environment; ''(ii)'' it is tailored to serve the needs of a Community of Practice; ''(iii)'' it is expected to provide a community of practice with the whole array of commodities needed to accomplish the community’s goal(s); ''(iv)'' it is open and flexible with respect to the overall service offering and lifetime; and ''(v)'' it promotes fine-grained controlled sharing of both intermediate and final research results by guaranteeing ownership, provenance, and attribution. operated through a gCube-based infrastructure at times may be overwhelming and difficult to grasp by representatives from e.g. the Communities of Practice behind the Business Cases.

In order to facilitate the collection of and negotiations on specific desiderata, a template that captures first the CoPCommunity of Practice. 'wishlist', and then discusses these with Board representatives, WP3 members, and PEB delegates.

The current template contains:

Product

Describe the expected service in maximum 3 sentences

Priority to CoPCommunity of Practice.

List proposed solution priority following the iMarine Board priority setting criteria:

• Potential target community;
• Users;
• Potential for co-funding;
• Structural allocation of resources;
• Referred in DoW;
• Business Cases;
• How does the proposed action generally support sustainability aspects;
• How consistent it is with EC regulations/strategies (eg INSPIRE);
• Re-usability – benefits – compatibility;

Parentage

Relation to CoPCommunity of Practice. Software

Relation to D4S technologies

Productivity

Are the proposed measures effective?

Does it reduce a known workload?

Presentation

How must the component be delivered to users? (UI Design / on-line help / training material / support)

Policy

Are there any policies available that describe data access and sharing?

Have the Copyright / attribution / metadata / legal aspects been addressed from a user and technology perspective?