Difference between revisions of "SemanticCluster2ndReview"
(→Mimimum Set of Demos) |
(→Mimimum Set of Demos) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Why: It is related to the development activities of T10.4, | Why: It is related to the development activities of T10.4, | ||
the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. | the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. | ||
| − | Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. | + | Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version |
| + | (for more, e.g. VRE to use, list of queries, see the xsearch web page). | ||
It also uses FLOD. | It also uses FLOD. | ||
Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VRE, | Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VRE, | ||
Revision as of 14:18, 22 February 2013
context: http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/Semantic_cluster_achievements
Mimimum Set of Demos
This page describes the minimum requirements for demos to be done during the 2nd Review. The referred demos correspond to WP/Tasks, milestones and deliverables, reviewer comments, etc, therefore we should all be ready to demonstrate them if requested.
- XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch).
Why: It is related to the development activities of T10.4, the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version (for more, e.g. VREVirtual Research Environment. to use, list of queries, see the xsearch web page). It also uses FLOD. Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VREVirtual Research Environment., e.g. which sources or search systems will be considered by gcube search (ticket 1190:https://issue.imarine.research-infrastructures.eu/ticket/1190)
Why: Related to the integration/harmonization activities of WP3 (which were not documented in the 1st year), the discussions in the 1st review, and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable by the individual sources used for populating the repository.
- FAO/Claudio: Do you want to propose something for this review?
- IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? E.g. Ecoscope fact sheet?
Other Possible Demos
- Demo x
