Difference between revisions of "SemanticCluster2ndReview"
(→Mimimum Set of Demos) |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch). | * XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch). | ||
| − | Why: It is related to | + | Why: It is related to the development activities of T10.4, |
| − | the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. | + | the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. |
Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. | Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. | ||
| + | It also uses FLOD. | ||
Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VRE. | Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VRE. | ||
* TLO (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/Top_Level_Ontology). | * TLO (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/Top_Level_Ontology). | ||
| − | Why: Related to WP3, the discussions in the 1st review, and the | + | Why: Related to the integration/harmonization activities of WP3 (which were not documented in the 1st year), the discussions in the 1st review, and the |
| − | expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): | + | expectations of the reviewers. |
| − | Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, | + | Status (Feb 2013): Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, |
through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable | through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable | ||
by the individual sources used for populating the repository. | by the individual sources used for populating the repository. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 21: | ||
* IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? fact sheets, ... ? | * IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? fact sheets, ... ? | ||
| − | |||
== Other Possible Demos == | == Other Possible Demos == | ||
* Demo x | * Demo x | ||
Revision as of 11:03, 22 February 2013
Mimimum Set of Demos
This page describes the minimum requirements for demos to be done during the 2nd Review. The referred demos correspond to WP/Tasks, milestones and deliverables, reviewer comments, etc, therefore we should all be ready to demonstrate them if requested.
- XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch).
Why: It is related to the development activities of T10.4, the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. It also uses FLOD. Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VREVirtual Research Environment..
Why: Related to the integration/harmonization activities of WP3 (which were not documented in the 1st year), the discussions in the 1st review, and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable by the individual sources used for populating the repository.
- FAO/Claudio: Do you want to propose something for this review?
- IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? fact sheets, ... ?
Other Possible Demos
- Demo x
