Difference between revisions of "SemanticCluster2ndReview"
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
therefore we should all be ready to demonstrate them if requested. | therefore we should all be ready to demonstrate them if requested. | ||
| − | * | + | * XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch). |
| − | * | + | Why: It is related to 10.4, the corresponding milestone, |
| − | * | + | the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. |
| + | Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. | ||
| + | Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VRE. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * TLO (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/Top_Level_Ontology). | ||
| + | Why: Related to WP3, the discussions in the 1st review, and the | ||
| + | expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): | ||
| + | Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, | ||
| + | through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable | ||
| + | by the individual sources used for populating the repository. | ||
| + | |||
| + | * FAO/Claudio: Do you want to propose something for this review? | ||
| + | |||
| + | * IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? fact sheets, ... ? | ||
== Other Possible Demos == | == Other Possible Demos == | ||
* Demo x | * Demo x | ||
Revision as of 15:32, 21 February 2013
Mimimum Set of Demos
This page describes the minimum requirements for demos to be done during the 2nd Review. The referred demos correspond to WP/Tasks, milestones and deliverables, reviewer comments, etc, therefore we should all be ready to demonstrate them if requested.
- XSearch (http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch).
Why: It is related to 10.4, the corresponding milestone, the reporting and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): demonstratable, also its gCube version. Main ongoing and related activities: those related with the deployment of a new VREVirtual Research Environment..
Why: Related to WP3, the discussions in the 1st review, and the expectations of the reviewers. Status (Feb 2013): Its value for integration can be demonstrated over a triple-store that stores TLO-described instances, through a set of queries which are answerable, although not answerable by the individual sources used for populating the repository.
- FAO/Claudio: Do you want to propose something for this review?
- IRD/Julien: Do you want to propose something for this review? fact sheets, ... ?
Other Possible Demos
- Demo x
