Difference between revisions of "Ecosystem Approach Community of Practice: NEAFC2ICES"
(Created page with "The many opportunities provided by Virtual Research Environment operated through a gCube-based infrastructure at times may be overwhelming and difficult to grasp by representativ...") |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | NEAFC has been offered a sub-contract to assist the iMarine consurtium with the development of a set of services that enables NEAFC to securily consume and share fisheries information. some of these facilities can not be provided by Virtual Research Environments, as the data to feed these services can not leave the NEAFC premises. Therefore, a facility is required that can be installed, configured and controlled by NEAFC staff. This facility would be the 'gatekeeper' to the NEAFC repository. Similar 'connectors' or more often needed, and e.g. through the iMarine OpenSDMX initiative, example connectors have already been delivered. | |
| − | In order to facilitate the collection of and negotiations on specific desiderata, | + | In order to facilitate the collection of and negotiations on specific desiderata, the below description captures the CoP 'wishlist', for discussion with NEAFC representatives, WP3 members, and PEB delegates. |
The current template contains: | The current template contains: | ||
; Product | ; Product | ||
| − | : | + | : Support to NEAFC to 1.) anonymize confidential data in their infrastructure, 2) convert to the FLUX format, as per DG MARE requirements, 3.) publish these anonymized datasets in a controlled repository, 4) ensure that these data-sets can be analyzed in a variety of other VRE's for e.g. statistical trend analysis, plotting, graphing and tabulation. |
; Priority to CoP | ; Priority to CoP | ||
Revision as of 11:29, 26 April 2013
NEAFC has been offered a sub-contract to assist the iMarine consurtium with the development of a set of services that enables NEAFC to securily consume and share fisheries information. some of these facilities can not be provided by Virtual Research Environments, as the data to feed these services can not leave the NEAFC premises. Therefore, a facility is required that can be installed, configured and controlled by NEAFC staff. This facility would be the 'gatekeeper' to the NEAFC repository. Similar 'connectors' or more often needed, and e.g. through the iMarine OpenSDMX initiative, example connectors have already been delivered.
In order to facilitate the collection of and negotiations on specific desiderata, the below description captures the CoPCommunity of Practice. 'wishlist', for discussion with NEAFC representatives, WP3 members, and PEB delegates.
The current template contains:
- Product
- Support to NEAFC to 1.) anonymize confidential data in their infrastructure, 2) convert to the FLUX format, as per DG MARE requirements, 3.) publish these anonymized datasets in a controlled repository, 4) ensure that these data-sets can be analyzed in a variety of other VREVirtual Research Environment.'s for e.g. statistical trend analysis, plotting, graphing and tabulation.
- Priority to CoPCommunity of Practice.
- List proposed solution priority following the iMarine Board priority setting criteria:
- Potential target community;
- Users;
- Potential for co-funding;
- Structural allocation of resources;
- Referred in DoW;
- Business Cases;
- How does the proposed action generally support sustainability aspects;
- How consistent it is with EC regulations/strategies (eg INSPIRE);
- Re-usability – benefits – compatibility;
- Parentage
- Relation to CoPCommunity of Practice. Software
- Relation to D4S technologies
- Productivity
- Are the proposed measures effective?
- Does it reduce a known workload?
- Presentation
- How must the component be delivered to users? (UI Design / on-line help / training material / support)
- Policy
- Are there any policies available that describe data access and sharing?
- Have the Copyright / attribution / metadata / legal aspects been addressed from a user and technology perspective?
