Difference between revisions of "Top Level Ontology"

From D4Science Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(→‎MarineTLO Related Tickets)
(→‎Motivating Scenarios)
Line 14: Line 14:
 
'''For Semantic Post-Processing of the Results of Keyword Search Queries:''' Another big challenge nowadays is how to integrate structured data with unstructured data (documents and text). The availability of harmonized structured knowledge about the marine domain can be exploited for a semantic post-processing of the search results (over dedicated or general purpose search systems). [http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch XSearch] is a meta-search engine that offers semantic post-processing of search results and is able to analyze the returned results by exploiting also the availability of semantic repositories (e.g. SPARQL endpoints). Xsearch could exploit MarineTLO for providing more complete information about the identified entities.
 
'''For Semantic Post-Processing of the Results of Keyword Search Queries:''' Another big challenge nowadays is how to integrate structured data with unstructured data (documents and text). The availability of harmonized structured knowledge about the marine domain can be exploited for a semantic post-processing of the search results (over dedicated or general purpose search systems). [http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/XSearch XSearch] is a meta-search engine that offers semantic post-processing of search results and is able to analyze the returned results by exploiting also the availability of semantic repositories (e.g. SPARQL endpoints). Xsearch could exploit MarineTLO for providing more complete information about the identified entities.
  
−
'''For Enabling Complex Query Services over Integrated Data:''' MarineTLO can be used as the schema for setting up integrated repositories that offer more complex query services, which cannot be supported by the individual underlying sources. In general, there are two main approaches for building and querying such repositories: the materialized integration approach (or warehouse approach), and the virtual integration (or mediator) approach (more information about these sources can be found in '''REF_XXX'''). The key point is that in both cases we need a schema and MarineTLO can serve this requirement.
+
'''For Enabling Complex Query Services over Integrated Data:''' MarineTLO can be used as the schema for setting up integrated repositories that offer more complex query services, which cannot be supported by the individual underlying sources. In general, there are two main approaches for building and querying such repositories: the materialized integration approach (or warehouse approach), and the virtual integration (or mediator) approach (more information about these approaches can be found in '''[Tzitzikas-MTSR'13]'''). The key point is that in both cases we need a schema and MarineTLO can serve this requirement.
  
 
== MarineTLO as a product ==
 
== MarineTLO as a product ==

Revision as of 10:23, 30 October 2014

Introduction

In a nutshell

One of the main characteristics of biodiversity data is its cross-disciplinary feature and the extremely broad range of data types, structures, and semantic concepts which encompasses. Moreover, biodiversity data, especially in the marine domain, is widely distributed, with few well-established repositories or standard protocols for their archiving, access, and retrieval. Queries like “Given the scientific name of a species, find its predators with the related taxon-rank classification and with the different codes that the organizations use to refer to them", cannot be formulated (and consequently nor answered) by any individual source. To formulate such queries we need an expressive conceptual model, while for answering them we also have to assemble pieces of information stored in different sources. To fill this gap, we have designed and implemented a top level ontology, called Marine Top Level Ontology (for short MarineTLO).

Motivating Scenarios

The availability of a top level ontology for the marine domain would be useful in various scenarios. Below we will describe them.

For Publishing Linked Data: There is a trend towards publishing Linked Data; consequently a rising issue concerns the structure that is beneficial to use during such publishing. The semantic structure that will be presented can be used by the involved organizations for anticipating future needs for information integration, and thus alleviating the required effort for (post) integration.

For Generating Fact Sheets: FactSheetGenerator is an application provided by IRD aiming at providing factual knowledge about the marine domain by mashing-up relevant knowledge distributed across several data sources. Currently, FactSheetGenerator uses only ECOSCOPE and related knowledge stored in other sources (e.g., about commercial codes or taxonomic information) cannot be exploited. MarineTLO could be exploited for advancing this application, i.e., for providing more complete semantic descriptions.

For Semantic Post-Processing of the Results of Keyword Search Queries: Another big challenge nowadays is how to integrate structured data with unstructured data (documents and text). The availability of harmonized structured knowledge about the marine domain can be exploited for a semantic post-processing of the search results (over dedicated or general purpose search systems). XSearch is a meta-search engine that offers semantic post-processing of search results and is able to analyze the returned results by exploiting also the availability of semantic repositories (e.g. SPARQL endpoints). Xsearch could exploit MarineTLO for providing more complete information about the identified entities.

For Enabling Complex Query Services over Integrated Data: MarineTLO can be used as the schema for setting up integrated repositories that offer more complex query services, which cannot be supported by the individual underlying sources. In general, there are two main approaches for building and querying such repositories: the materialized integration approach (or warehouse approach), and the virtual integration (or mediator) approach (more information about these approaches can be found in [Tzitzikas-MTSR'13]). The key point is that in both cases we need a schema and MarineTLO can serve this requirement.

MarineTLO as a product

We used a set of underlying sources for integrating their concepts in MarineTLO. Below we briefly describe these sources, and then describe the ontology MarineTLO and its corresponding releases.

The main underlying sources

Fisheries Linked Open Data: FLOD, created and maintained by Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), is dedicated to create a dense network of relationships among the entities of the Fishery domains, and to programmatically serve them to semantic and traditional application environments. The FLOD content is exposed either via a public SPARQL endpoint[1] (suitable for semantic applications) or via a JAVA API to be embedded in consumers’ application code. Currently, the FLOD network includes entities and relationships from the domains of Marine Species, Water Areas, Land Areas, Exclusive Economic Zones, and serves software applications in the domain of statistics and GIS.

ECOSCOPE Knowledge Base: IRD offers a public SPARQL endpoint[2] for its knowledge base containing geographical data, pictures and information about marine ecosystems (specifically data about fishes, sharks, related persons, countries and organizations, harbors, vessels, etc.).

WoRMS: The World Register of Marine Species[3] currently contains more than 200 thousand species, around 380 thousand species names including synonyms, and 470 thousands taxa (infraspecies to kingdoms).

FishBase: FishBase[4] is a global database of fish species. It is a relational database containing information about the taxonomy, geographical distribution, biometrics, population, genetic data and many more. Currently, it contains more the 32 thousand species and more than 300 thousand common names in various languages.

DBpedia: DBpedia[5] is a project focusing on the task of converting content from Wikipedia to structured knowledge so that Semantic Web techniques can be employed against it. At the time of writing this article, the English version of the knowledge base of DBpedia describes more than 4.5 million things, containing persons, places, works, species, etc. In our case, we are using a subset of DBpedia’s knowledge base containing only fishes (i.e. instances classified under the class http://dbpedia.org/ontology/Fish).

The Marine Top Level Ontology

MarineTLO is not supposed to be a single ontology covering the entirety of what exists. It aims at being a global core model that (a) covers with suitable abstractions the domains under consideration to enable the most fundamental queries, (b) can be extended to any level of detail on demand, and (c) can adequately map and integrate data originating from distinct sources. This approach has two main benefits:

  • reduced effort for improving and evolving it since the focus is given on one model rather than many
  • reduced effort for constructing mappings since this approach avoid the pair-wise mappings between individual metadata formats and/or ontologies.

For the development and evolution of MarineTLO we have adopted an iterative and incremental methodology comprising the following steps: (i) ontological analysis of the underlying sources, (ii) design, (iii) implementation and (iv) evaluation. The activities of each iteration has been monitored by opening and corresponding tickets. The section REF_TICKETS_SECTION contains a list of the tickets that have been opened. For the implementation of MarineTLO we have used OWL 2 (Web Ontology Language) while for the needs of evaluation we used the notion of competence queries.

Releases

In total we released 4 versions of the MarineTLO. Each release was able to cover various concepts for different sources. Below we report the contents of each version, some basic information and links its documentation.

MarineTLO Versions
Version Classes and Properties Underlying Sources Concepts covered OWL File Documentation Mappings Competence Queries Release Date
Version 1 17 classes and 8 properties FLOD, ECOSCOPE, WORMS Species, Scientific Names, Predators http://goo.gl/ukxmAv http://goo.gl/kEfp8g http://goo.gl/3sMdwR March 2013
Version 2 57 classes and 22 properties FLOD, ECOSCOPE, WORMS, DBpedia Species, Scientific Names, Predators, Authorships http://goo.gl/JTh8p9 http://goo.gl/Y9bGFy http://goo.gl/I6STNv http://goo.gl/3ZNqb4 July 2013
Version 3 57 classes and 25 properties FLOD, ECOSCOPE, WORMS, DBpedia, Fishbase Species, Scientific Names, Common Names, Predators, Authorships, Ecosystems, Countries, Water Areas, Vessels, Gears, EEZ http://goo.gl/J15OCE http://goo.gl/FygSd6 http://goo.gl/vxESUF http://goo.gl/yTaz7O October 2013
Version 4 127 classes and 81 properties FLOD, ECOSCOPE, WORMS, DBpedia, Fishbase Species, Scientific Names, Common Names, Predators, Authorships, Ecosystems, Countries, Water Areas, Vessels, Gears, EEZ, Bibliography, Statistical Indicators http://goo.gl/Yh1Uot http://goo.gl/KIFY6e http://goo.gl/WU3xkG http://goo.gl/KIFY6e July 2014

References

Related Links/Publications

  • MarineTLO public website http://www.ics.forth.gr/isl/MarineTLO/
  • MarineTLO-based Warehouse wiki page http://wiki.i-marine.eu/index.php/MarineTLO-based_warehouse
  • [Tzitzikas-MTSR'13] Y. Tzitzikas, C. Alloca, C. Bekiari, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios, M. Doerr, N. Minadakis, T. Patkos and L. Candela. Integrating Heterogeneous and Distributed Information about Marine Species through a Top Level Ontology, Proceedings of the 7th Metadata and Semantic Research Conference, MTSR'13, Thessaloniki, Greece, November 2013.
  • [Tzitzikas-ERCIM'14] Y. Tzitzikas, C. Allocca, C. Bekiari, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios and N. Minadakis. Ontology-based Integration of Heterogeneous and Distributed Information of the Marine Domain, ERCIM News 2014 (96), Special theme: Linked Open Data, January 2014
  • [Tzitzikas-LWDM'14] Y. Tzitzikas, N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios, C. Alloca and N. Mountantonakis. Quantifying the Connectivity of a Semantic Warehouse, 4th International Workshop on Linked Web Data Management, LWDM'14, Athens, Greece, March 2014.
  • [Moutantonakis-PROFILES'14] M. Mountantonakis, C. Allocca, P. Fafalios, N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, C. Lantzaki and Y. Tzitzikas. Extending VoID for Expressing the Connectivity Metrics of a Semantic Warehouse, 1st International Workshop on Dataset Profiling & Federated Search for Linked Data (PROFILES'14), in conjunction with the 11th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC'14), Anissaras Hersonissou, Crete, Greece, May 2014.
  • [Tzitzikas-ESCW'14] Y. Tzitzikas, N. Minadakis, Y. Marketakis, P. Fafalios, C. Alloca, N. Mountantonakis and I. Zidianaki. MatWare: Constructing and Exploiting Domain Specific Warehouses by Aggregating Semantic Data, 11th Extended Semantic Web Conference (ESWC'14), Anissaras Hersonissou, Crete, Greece, May 2014.

Related Meetings & Minutes

Related tickets

Retrieved from "https://wiki.d4science.org/index.php?title=Top_Level_Ontology&oldid=20860"