Difference between revisions of "Ecosystem Approach Community of Practice: Governance of D4Science e-infrastructure"
Marc.taconet (Talk | contribs) (Created page with " If not already required as a legal entity, a periodic audit process may also be necessary. A practical balance will need to be found between rigour and flexibility and between ...") |
Marc.taconet (Talk | contribs) |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == General overview == | ||
| − | + | The effective functioning of the D4Science entity, the confidence developed with funders and clients, the efficiency of resource use, and the strategic capability developed will all ultimately depend on the governance system adopted and its functional characteristics. A number of options may need to be explored, potentially also in conjunction with defining the legal entity, to ensure that the interests of diverse stakeholders can be met, that clear rules of conduct (and sanctions) are in place for those acting for the entity, and that transparent and equitable contractual and other interactive arrangements are in place for partners and clients. If not already required as a legal entity, a periodic audit process may also be necessary. A practical balance will need to be found between rigor and flexibility and between scrupulous detailed process and the costs of governance. In the first instance it would preferable to aim for the simplest possible structure and functioning rules, and add to this only as or when required. | |
| − | If not already required as a legal entity, a periodic audit process may also be necessary. A practical balance will need to be found between | + | |
Latest revision as of 22:55, 3 September 2012
General overview
The effective functioning of the D4ScienceAn e-Infrastructure operated by the D4Science.org initiative. entity, the confidence developed with funders and clients, the efficiency of resource use, and the strategic capability developed will all ultimately depend on the governance system adopted and its functional characteristics. A number of options may need to be explored, potentially also in conjunction with defining the legal entity, to ensure that the interests of diverse stakeholders can be met, that clear rules of conduct (and sanctions) are in place for those acting for the entity, and that transparent and equitable contractual and other interactive arrangements are in place for partners and clients. If not already required as a legal entity, a periodic audit process may also be necessary. A practical balance will need to be found between rigor and flexibility and between scrupulous detailed process and the costs of governance. In the first instance it would preferable to aim for the simplest possible structure and functioning rules, and add to this only as or when required.
