Difference between revisions of "Talk:Metadata standards"
From D4Science Wiki
(Created page with "The pages handles discussions about the different Metadata Standards being addressed in iMarine. ==Dublin Core (DC) == == Darwin Core (DwC) == == Geographic information (ISO/T...") |
(→Handling iMarine Business Metadata through selected iMarine Metadata standards) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
'''E.Blondel (28/10/2013)''' | '''E.Blondel (28/10/2013)''' | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | It would be important to distinguish well between the iMarine Business Metadata as an abstract metadata model that handles a minimum set of metadata elements, and the different internationally-recognized metadata standards that could implement such abstract model according to the key data domains. Hence, it would wise not to build the vision of Business metadata on a single and well-known metadata standard, but to define it in complete abstraction from existing metadata standard implementations & vocabularies. This would allow: | |
| − | + | * to guarantee mappings between the iMarine Business Metadata & international-recognized metadata standard implementations | |
| − | + | * to implement business metadata with the most appropriate standard according to key data domains, and not to bound the iMarine business metadata implementation to one single metadata standard | |
Latest revision as of 13:48, 28 October 2013
The pages handles discussions about the different Metadata Standards being addressed in iMarine.
Dublin Core (DC)
Darwin Core (DwC)
Geographic information (ISO/TC211, OGC)
SDMX
FLUX
Handling iMarine Business Metadata through selected iMarine Metadata standards
E.Blondel (28/10/2013)
It would be important to distinguish well between the iMarine Business Metadata as an abstract metadata model that handles a minimum set of metadata elements, and the different internationally-recognized metadata standards that could implement such abstract model according to the key data domains. Hence, it would wise not to build the vision of Business metadata on a single and well-known metadata standard, but to define it in complete abstraction from existing metadata standard implementations & vocabularies. This would allow:
- to guarantee mappings between the iMarine Business Metadata & international-recognized metadata standard implementations
- to implement business metadata with the most appropriate standard according to key data domains, and not to bound the iMarine business metadata implementation to one single metadata standard
